<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>caching on semikolan</title>
    <link>https://semikolan.me/tags/caching/</link>
    <description>Recent content in caching on semikolan</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://semikolan.me/tags/caching/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Cache Invalidation, Mostly Naming</title>
      <link>https://semikolan.me/blog/cache-invalidation-mostly-naming/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://semikolan.me/blog/cache-invalidation-mostly-naming/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The joke is that there are two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation and naming things. I&amp;rsquo;ve come to think they&amp;rsquo;re the same problem wearing two hats.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-a-key-really-is&#34;&gt;What a key really is &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#what-a-key-really-is&#34; aria-label=&#34;Link to this section&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A cache key is a name for a claim: &amp;ldquo;the answer to &lt;em&gt;this question&lt;/em&gt; is &lt;em&gt;that value&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;rdquo; Invalidation is just noticing the claim stopped being true. The reason invalidation is hard is almost never the eviction mechanics — it&amp;rsquo;s that the key doesn&amp;rsquo;t actually name the claim.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
